Do Editors Get Better with Age?

At our monthly SCBWI meeting on Monday, I learned that Emma Ledbetter, assistant editor as Atheneum, is going to be one of the advisors at this year’s Falling Leaves master class in Lake George – and that made me smile. Three-and-a-half years ago, Emma was my mentor at the Rutgers One-on-One Conference. It was her first Rutgers -- and mine. And it made me wonder whether editors, like authors, get better with age.

Now, before anyone sees this as negative or an attack on Emma’s abilities, let me say that I have no complaints about her. I implemented one of her suggestions in my picture book, and she suggested I send it to her boss (mentioning her in my query letter), since, as an assistant, she didn’t yet have acquisition authority. But that doesn’t answer my basic question: Do editors get better with age?

It’s a truism that authors get better with age. While a few authors’ best-known works were their first books (Elie Wiesel, J.D. Salinger) that doesn’t mean it was their best work. And scores of author got better after they had a few books under their belts (Mark Twain, Stephen King, Charles Dickens, George Orwell, etc., etc.) So, what this really tells us is that writers get better with practice. The closer they get to their 10,000 hours, they better they get. But practice takes time, and time brings experience and age. Experience makes one a better writer because it gives you something to say and something to draw upon – but experience, without practice, gives you something to say without the skill to say it.

The same is true of editors. After all that education and English degrees and hundreds of books under their belt, experience makes them better editors because a good editor doesn’t just fix commas and semicolons -- she develops and massages the author’s style until the message gets out. And that is something a veteran editor does better than an inexperienced assistant. (And this is to say nothing of the relationship between author and editor, which would probably be a great topic for a future post!).

Of course, that’s true of any job, whether it’s master mechanic, carpenter, accountant brain surgeon. Time on the job makes you better -- and I’m not making some academic argument here. I was once in Emma’s shoes (and yeah, that's as uncomfortable as it sounds). That is, I got my first editing job nineteen years ago, and I’d sure like to think I’m a whole lot better now than I was then. Today, I’m the Executive Editor at AlbanyEditing. There is no way I could have handled that two decades ago.

Come to think of it, I'm sure I couldn't have handled Emma’s job at a big publisher like Atheneum then either.

Emma Ledbetter has a great reputation in the world of kidlit, and Nancy Castaldo, the Eastern NY SCBWI regional advisor, sang her praises. Since she was good three years ago, I can only imagine that she’s amazing now. And I hope to see that in person at Falling Leaves!

P.S. I'm still funding my next book through Indiegogo. Any amount you can contribute, is greatly appreciated. And the best part is, you get a copy of the book! Thanks for your donation!

What Book Changed Your Life?

Last weekend, at the Rutgers One-on-One Conference, author Bruce Coville discussed a fan letter he had received. A reader credited him with her decision to join the Peace Corps. She loved his book so much, she even cited it in her application essay. It’s clear that My Teacher Is an Alien changed that young woman’s life.

Everyone has a book like that, one that absolutely changed your life. I remember the greatest compliment I ever received came from an African-American actress, Dee Watson, who said, “You’d make a good Atticus Finch.”

Why was that the greatest compliment? Because To Kill a Mockingbird changed my life.  It has stayed with me decades after I first read it, and while it’s impossible to live up to the standard set by Atticus, it’s not impossible to model your life after the example set out in Harper Lee’s masterpiece.

Life-changing books  are common in young adult stories as teens enter their formative years. It’s also true of books like To Kill a Mockingbird, originally written for adults but that serve as de facto YA on high-school reading lists. Lives, decisions, and character are shaped every year by classics like Black Like Me, 1984, Pride & Prejudice, Crime & Punishment, etc. And no list, no matter how complete, includes the thousands of picture books, middle-grade and

YA titles children cling to every day.

Fortunately, adults can find books that reach them, too; maybe even make them see the world in a whole  new way. I recently re-read Tommy Moore’s A Ph.D. in Happiness From the Great Comedians. It lifts your spirits in a way far beyond “the healing power of humor;” it can change your entire outlook by presenting practical steps drawn from the world of stand-up comedy. It my case, it even justifies the years I spent in comedy and the fact that humor remains my primary tool for dealing with problems and reaching people. One book – a how-to book taken from the ways legendary comics view and treat the world – really can help you understand how you can live your life.

But it’s children’s authors and their books that have the biggest influence. Adult personalities are largely shaped and readers seek out books of interest to them, but children, particularly young children, are an (largely) empty canvas. They’ll face new ideas, new concepts, new challenges. They’ll read a book ten times (or have it read to them!) and still pick it up an 11^th time. Even books that aren’t particularly challenging but that are delightful nonetheless – Fox in Socks, Don’t Let the Pigeon Drive the Bus, etc. – still create lifelong readers.

So whether it’s My Friend Flicka, Tom Sawyer, Encyclopedia Brown, Nancy Drew or something no one has heard of (or you’re too ashamed to admit – hey, I loved The Five Chinese Brothers as a kid), there was a book that changed your life.

So let me know – what book changed your life?

PREPARING FOR RUTGERS ONE-ON-ONE A SECOND TIME

How did I go about preparing for this year’s Rutgers One-on-One Conference differently than last year’s? I didn’t really – except in one major way.

Last year, I was accepted after sending in a picture book manuscript. While it hasn’t been picked up yet, it opened a very nice door for me over at HarperCollins. The editor rejected it, but said she loved “everything” about the book except the main character’s species. Yes, the species. It’s a picture book, and that happens. She didn’t feel it was commercial enough (for future reference, please note that Harper loves cats, dogs, elephants, lions, etc. – animals kids already know. There’s a reason they’ve populated picture books for decades. I’ve heard this now from two editors and an agent). So she asked for a second manuscript, something “commercial.” I sent here the most blatantly commercial thing I’ve ever written. Again, she liked the story, but felt the main character isn’t strong enough to anchor a series. He’s too quiet, and not energetic or funny.

But she asked to see something else.

So I took out an old manuscript, reworked the main character a bit, and am preparing to send it to her. I’ve had editors ask me to send additional work before, but never a third time. Yeah, you can bet I’m sending it.

Rutgers opened that door for me. And that editor will be there again this year. I will find her long enough to say “hi.”

So how does that change how I’m preparing for Rutgers this year? It doesn’t, except this time I was accepted for a middle-grade manuscript. That means looking for something different in the 80 or so editors and agents in attendance. It means looking for those interested in both picture books and middle-grade books.

It’s a daunting task.

Now, editors and agents handle works of all stripes. Some love commercial, some love artsy. Some loved fast-paced and frenetic, others love quiet and introspective. They run the gamut from paranormal fantasy to issue-driven angst. I decided to quickly categorize my work according to industry definitions beyond the broad scope of genre and find editors who want that who are interested in my writing strengths.

Commercial? Check.

Funny main character? Check.

Strong hook? Check.

Fast-paced? Check.

I will only be pitching manuscripts that fit those categories. Except for overt commercialism, they’re my strengths. I’m up to the D’s on the editor/agent/mentor list, but I’ve already found three strong candidates. Even if I don’t meet them at the conference (since it can be big and unwieldy), I know I’ll be submitting to them afterward. Immediately afterward.

In the meantime, I’ll get to say hi to a very helpful editor from Harper, and let her know a third manuscript is on its way!

For a checklist on how to prepare for a writers conference, please read Writers Conference Checklist.

What I Learned At Rutgers – Not the University, the Council on Children’s Literature

I attended the 42nd annual Rutgers Council on Children’s Literature this past weekend. It is a writers conference of high renowned and in that regard, did not disappoint.

Before we get into the words of wisdom and the what-editors-are-looking-for nuggets, let me say that I was happy to see three other children’s writers from the Capital District (yeah, us!) in attendance. Heather Schwartz (Women of the U.S. Air Force; The Foul, Filthy American Frontier), Victoria DeAngelis and Dan Masucci, all talented in their own right.

Rutgers One on One

My One on One was with Emma Ledbetter, assistant editor at Atheneum. We went over Leaping Lemmings for about 20 minutes or so. She provided several good ideas and seemed adept at working with writers, asking me for my input, etc. It was less a lecture or critique and more of a collaborative effort. We then talked about other projects I’m working on. She seemed most impressed with an middle grade I’m working on which is good, because starting that project was inspired by another editor at Atheneum. I’ll have to get back to that middle-grade manuscript very soon.

Rutgers Five on Five

Emma, of course, was also part of the five professionals in our five-on-five, in this case four editors and one author. Let’s hit the highlights of what they agreed on are industry trends.

• Mash-Ups. Everyone’s in love with mash-ups, you know, those books that take two archetypes and bring them together. Everyone was looking for the next Shark vs. Train (kids love sharks and trains. It’s a natural), or something similar to a new book from Atheneum, Zombies in Love (can be promoted on Halloween and Valentine’s Day).
• Crossovers. Something that can be sold in more than one genre, particularly with undiscovered adult appeal. A lot of YA has this (adults love dystopian almost as much as teen-agers), but so do some picture books, like It’s a Book. Also Zombies in Love. The book is shaped like a coffin for that reason, and filled with dating references and frustrations adults (zombie or otherwise) will get.
• Trends in Children's Literature. All the editors are looking 3-5 years out to figure out what the next big thing is. For instance, if three years ago you guessed food as this year’s hot topic for teens, you’re a big winner. I’m guessing if the economy doesn’t improve, food will continue to be big in three years. And so will starvation.
• Interactive Apps. No one seems to know exactly which way the e-book industry is headed, but it’s certainly going to continue to grow and print books will someday be a novelty item. With that in mind, editors are keeping an eye open for books that come with all sorts of bells and whistles to keep young readers entertained. Probably easiest for the board book, picture book, chapter book, and non-fiction markets, but all books can have pop-ups, links, maps, graphs, etc. Even dark, dystopian YA. After all, readers need to know their way around those mean streets, too.

Finally, I’d be remiss if I didn’t say a word about the day’s keynote speaker, Jon Scieszka. His speech was funny (as expected), but had its underlying serious side, first with Guys Read, an organization he began 10 years ago to encourage boys to find the books they enjoy. As he said, he read Dick and Jane in school, but home had the books he couldn’t put down. As boys fall further and further behind girls in school, particularly in reading, it’s an important message and important work.

But then he talked of rejection, a big topic at every conference, as publishing houses struggle to turn a profit and seem to sign fewer and fewer writers, or keep signings close to the vest. He discusses his own struggles in the late ‘80s, with plenty of rejections for The True Story of the 3 Little Pigs and The Stinky Cheese Man. He kidded the four or five dozen editors in the room with the pain of that time. At least it felt that way, because editors often made absurd suggestions about his submitted manuscripts. Called them “commercially unpublishable” (another buzzword at the conference. It came up at least twice, plus I heard it on Thursday from an agent). He told them they “need to get out more” and said, only half-jokingly, “you are the enemy.”

Can’t say I’d go that far, but I understand the sentiment, even if, for him, it’s coming 20 years later.

To sum up, while Rutgers didn’t turn out to be my best networking conference, it turned out to be the second-most instructive and the most business-oriented. I think I’ll apply next year. Maybe with that middle grade Emma seemed to like…

Reflections on a Summer Spent Writing

There's an old saying in the publishing world: don't submit in August. That's because the New York industry shuts down -- editors and agents go on vacation, catch up on the slush pile or head out to Los Angeles for a few days of sun and fun at the SCBWI Summer Conference.

The saying began when editors responded more quickly to manuscripts, even unsolicited manuscripts. I'm not sure it makes much difference today when no matter what time of year you submit you're looking at a six-month wait, but the old saying stands: don't submit in August!

That doesn't mean as a writer, particularly a writer trying to break into the business, that you should take the month off. Or any part of the summer. Or Labor Day weekend. After all, isn't writing your getaway?

How I Spent My Summer Writing

1. Stayed in Touch with Two Literary Agents. Nothing signed, of course, but one shows great promise, having requested a serious business plan from me that the other did not. We'll see. So I include writing a marketing plan among my summer writing accomplishments (oh, the business side of writing!)
2. Wrote Two Drafts of an Early Chapter Book.  A sequel to an earlier picture book that has been getting some attention. Following the Nick Bruel Bad Kitty model here. Workshopping and writing the third draft now.
3. Outlined a Middle-Grade Novel. Began this at the suggestion of an editor. It was my summer goal to start this book September 1. I did. Finished one chapter. Um, I guess that means 10 to go (a Fall goal!)
4. Attended a Writers Conference. Went to the Eastern NY SCBWI Mid-Hudson Conference in June and was accepted at their November Falling Leaves Workshop, as well as the Rutgers One on One in October. Very excited about both.
5. Submitted a Picture Book Rewrite to an Editor Who Requested It. Even submitted it in August. Guess I just didn't follow that adage.
6. Outlined Two Picture Books. One is a sequel to the requested picture book. Editor wanted to know if I could see it as a series. Of course! Well, I can now...

Maybe that should be another writer's adage: See everything as a series.

Hope everyone else kept busy writing these days, whether putting together a manuscript or attending to business (including conferences). Let me know what you accomplished this summer, and I hope it includes the word contract.

Just probably not with an August signing date...

*Next Up: Reflections on a Summer Spent Reading